01 / Deal teams
Counterparty intelligence on the deal timeline.
A defensible boutique counterparty report takes four to six weeks to produce. The deals worth doing the report for, in our experience, do not. The choice you end up making at the IC is usually between waiting for the report and closing without it. We work to make that a false choice.
Committee output
What your investment committee actually gets.
A categorical risk rating is something a committee can argue with. The 100,000-sample severity distribution our Scenario Flagging Algorithm produces is harder to push back on, because the run is reproducible from the seed retained in the engagement file. Every report we deliver carries both the analyst's categorical rating and the algorithm's distribution.
The recommendation in every report is conditional. The escalation triggers and gating conditions are written out. The IC memo writes itself in those terms, with proceed conditions, withdrawal conditions, and refresh events all named. Anyone who has sat through a committee where the analyst landed at "Medium Risk, but..." knows the cost of an unwritten hedge. We try to write the conditions out rather than leave them implied.
Refresh provisions are built into the engagement letter, and the trigger events that would warrant a refresh are named in the deliverable itself. If you close the deal and a watch indicator fires post-close, the delta refresh comes in at 30% of the original fee rather than being scoped as a fresh engagement.
How we differ
| Typical boutique firm | Red Label | |
|---|---|---|
| SLA | Four to six weeks | Ten to fifteen business days |
| Fee | $80,000 to $150,000 | $40,000 flat |
| Risk rating | Categorical | Categorical plus 100,000-sample severity distribution |
| Audit trail | Internal peer review | Public reproducible run URL |
| Recommendation | Verdict | Conditional, with named escalation triggers |
| Source labeling | Footnoted | Tier 1–4 rubric on every cited source |
| Beneficial ownership | Identified where opaque | Traced layer by layer; cold trails documented |
| Refresh | Quoted on request | 30% of original fee, named triggers |
Every engagement
Standard with every engagement.
Each engagement delivers a watermarked PDF with an executive one-pager scoped for IC circulation and a cover letter to named recipients. The conflict disclosure runs at the front of the document. A method note logs what was searched and, more importantly, what was not. Beneficial ownership trace runs through whatever opaque jurisdictions the actual structure touches, typically some combination of Wyoming, Delaware, BVI, Cayman, Cyprus, and UAE mainland. PEP screening sits in its own labeled section. Sanctions screening lists the named databases queried and the dates the queries were run. The report is signed by the lead analyst and countersigned by the reviewer.
The last page of every report sets out the refresh triggers and the pricing for follow-on work, so there is no scoping conversation needed if something fires later.
Read a specimen
The work is the better introduction.
The specimen we publish is a 65-page counterparty intelligence report on Roman Abramovich, prepared as a methodology demonstration on a public-record subject. He has been designated under six Western sanctions regimes since March 2022, including the United Kingdom, the European Union, Canada, Australia, Switzerland, and Jersey, with the United States as the conspicuous absentee. The recommendation against any new engagement is mechanical on that record.
For an IC reviewing the document for deal-team utility, the value sits in the conditional recommendation framework, the named refresh triggers, and the way the analyst-vs-model divergence is disclosed on the page rather than smoothed over. Reading the specimen is a better way to evaluate the work than reading anything we would write about it.
Best fit
Mid-market platform acquisitions in opaque jurisdictions
Founder-led targets where principal due diligence is the gating decision
Bolt-ons where speed matters more than ceremony
Cross-border portfolio monitoring with refresh provisions
Deal teams writing IC memos that need defensible quantitative backing
What we do not do
We do not write pitch decks for clients and we do not run reputation management work in any form. Engagements aimed at journalists, critics, or political opponents are not work we take. Engagements that would compromise independence get turned down at the conflict-check stage, which completes within two business days.
Discuss a deal in motion
Office of the Managing Partner
Red Label Intelligence
First conversations are confidential and carry no obligation on either side. Conflict checks complete within two business days. If you are working on a timeline shorter than ten business days, mention that on the first call so we can tell you whether we can help.
Send a confidential inquiry